Lauren's Reviews > Feed
Feed (Newsflesh, #1)
by
by
This is not a zombie book, or at least not a zombie book in the way it is marketed. That's only part of the reason why this book pisses me off. It promises a zombie novel despite the fact literally hundreds of pages go by without seeing one. It kicks off with a bang and some zombie action and then that's it. When I buy a book on the understanding it's about zombies, I do actually expect to, you know, experience them. Mira Grant assumes otherwise.
Two things that genuinely confused me; -- The pop culture references to the current world. Considering the fact this book is set 20 years in the future, in a completely different world and society and...people still remember Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Irwins are named after Steve Irwin, who, by the time all this takes place, is long dead. The whole George Romero thing irked me although I'm not really sure why. I understand his movies more or less catapulted zombies into mainstream culture but his most recent movies have flopped so hard people are wondering why he's still making them. I'm not ratting on the guy (Day Of The Dead was the movie that got me into zombies), I'm just saying I don't buy him having a god like status in society.
-- The lack of anything sexual. Why? I'm not saying I expected it, or really that the book would have been better with some sex scenes but Grant avoided them to obviously, going as far as the categorically state both Georgia and Shaun are celibate with such abruptness my 'icky sex' radar went through the damn roof. It didn't help that she went to noticeable lengths to point out that they only needed each other, no one else under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. I'm all for siblings being close but Grant failed massively and just made me suspicious some kind of relationship beyond brother/sister was going on. I was honestly expecting some kind of incest (they're adopted but have been brought up together. Not sure if that counts) subplot to come out and bite me.
Georgia, for me, was a huge irritant. She was possibly an author insert and definitely a Mary Sue. She's awkward and hates the lime light yet gets lots of it, even though she tries her hardest to avoid any attention. She's the head of the team yet hates the recognition this gives her. She claims to deliver nothing but the truth, despite her blog posts being nothing but her opinion. She has an eye condition (another thing Grant doesn't let you forget) that means she's sensitive to light and can't go without her epic sunglasses. This takes nothing away from her appearance other than to make her look moody and cool. If my memory serves me right, someone even likens her to a rock star. On the occasions that she wears contact lenses, she wears bright blue colored ones so she can make people feel uncomfortable. Maybe Grant is under the illusion this is a flaw in some way (much like apparently being clumsy and falling over a lot is, ala Bella Swan) but it's obviously another way of showing how cool Georgia is.
There was one passage when she even avoids a hug off of a well meaning woman who has been nothing other than kind to her because she didn't want to have to touch her/be touched. Hugs last about 3 seconds and she made it sound like touching this woman was akin to licking dog shit. What a rude dick.
She cannot create good, believable characters. This is my biggest pet peeve. None of them (least of all Georgia and Shaun) can have a conversation without cracking juvenile one liners and generally showing how bad ass they are.
And then there's the constant references to the blood testing kit. It was ok the first time, but 40th? Nope. I get it, it's a dangerous place to live (judging by the lack of zombie action, it's not really, but I'll pretend to go along with Mira anyway). I don't need to be constantly reminded every time they want to open a door. It's not like it's mentioned in detail the once, she go into detail every single time.
The writing is repetitive to a point bordering on infuriating. If I had to read 'This is my brother Shaun, he pokes things with sticks!' one more time I probably would have burst a valve. She evens makes a reference to 'reaching for the stick' in the interview at the back. It wasn't funny the first time. Stop it.
I really, genuinely do not like this book. The more I think about it the more it pisses me off. I'm sorry but I'm not buying any of it.
Ps, the 'fictionals' made me want to smash my head off a wall. Wtf did she get that from?
Pps, stereotyping and judging is not good, Mira. The only female politician is described as having big fake boobs, zero brain cells and no real talents other than squeezing her ta-ta's together. Whether or not that's Georgia with a case of The Bitchies I don't know, but it's not exactly fair and reeks of pathetic insecurity.
The stereotyping? Oh dear. The only English character drops 'bloody hells' all over the place and has a blog called...'Fish & Clips'. I shit you not. Mira needs a holiday somewhere-outside-of-America.
Review for second book:
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
Two things that genuinely confused me; -- The pop culture references to the current world. Considering the fact this book is set 20 years in the future, in a completely different world and society and...people still remember Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Irwins are named after Steve Irwin, who, by the time all this takes place, is long dead. The whole George Romero thing irked me although I'm not really sure why. I understand his movies more or less catapulted zombies into mainstream culture but his most recent movies have flopped so hard people are wondering why he's still making them. I'm not ratting on the guy (Day Of The Dead was the movie that got me into zombies), I'm just saying I don't buy him having a god like status in society.
-- The lack of anything sexual. Why? I'm not saying I expected it, or really that the book would have been better with some sex scenes but Grant avoided them to obviously, going as far as the categorically state both Georgia and Shaun are celibate with such abruptness my 'icky sex' radar went through the damn roof. It didn't help that she went to noticeable lengths to point out that they only needed each other, no one else under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. I'm all for siblings being close but Grant failed massively and just made me suspicious some kind of relationship beyond brother/sister was going on. I was honestly expecting some kind of incest (they're adopted but have been brought up together. Not sure if that counts) subplot to come out and bite me.
Georgia, for me, was a huge irritant. She was possibly an author insert and definitely a Mary Sue. She's awkward and hates the lime light yet gets lots of it, even though she tries her hardest to avoid any attention. She's the head of the team yet hates the recognition this gives her. She claims to deliver nothing but the truth, despite her blog posts being nothing but her opinion. She has an eye condition (another thing Grant doesn't let you forget) that means she's sensitive to light and can't go without her epic sunglasses. This takes nothing away from her appearance other than to make her look moody and cool. If my memory serves me right, someone even likens her to a rock star. On the occasions that she wears contact lenses, she wears bright blue colored ones so she can make people feel uncomfortable. Maybe Grant is under the illusion this is a flaw in some way (much like apparently being clumsy and falling over a lot is, ala Bella Swan) but it's obviously another way of showing how cool Georgia is.
There was one passage when she even avoids a hug off of a well meaning woman who has been nothing other than kind to her because she didn't want to have to touch her/be touched. Hugs last about 3 seconds and she made it sound like touching this woman was akin to licking dog shit. What a rude dick.
She cannot create good, believable characters. This is my biggest pet peeve. None of them (least of all Georgia and Shaun) can have a conversation without cracking juvenile one liners and generally showing how bad ass they are.
And then there's the constant references to the blood testing kit. It was ok the first time, but 40th? Nope. I get it, it's a dangerous place to live (judging by the lack of zombie action, it's not really, but I'll pretend to go along with Mira anyway). I don't need to be constantly reminded every time they want to open a door. It's not like it's mentioned in detail the once, she go into detail every single time.
The writing is repetitive to a point bordering on infuriating. If I had to read 'This is my brother Shaun, he pokes things with sticks!' one more time I probably would have burst a valve. She evens makes a reference to 'reaching for the stick' in the interview at the back. It wasn't funny the first time. Stop it.
I really, genuinely do not like this book. The more I think about it the more it pisses me off. I'm sorry but I'm not buying any of it.
Ps, the 'fictionals' made me want to smash my head off a wall. Wtf did she get that from?
Pps, stereotyping and judging is not good, Mira. The only female politician is described as having big fake boobs, zero brain cells and no real talents other than squeezing her ta-ta's together. Whether or not that's Georgia with a case of The Bitchies I don't know, but it's not exactly fair and reeks of pathetic insecurity.
The stereotyping? Oh dear. The only English character drops 'bloody hells' all over the place and has a blog called...'Fish & Clips'. I shit you not. Mira needs a holiday somewhere-outside-of-America.
Review for second book:
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Feed.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
October 12, 2011
– Shelved
November 2, 2011
– Shelved as:
fail
July 28, 2012
– Shelved as:
zombies
September 24, 2012
– Shelved as:
toilet-paper-when-world-ends
Comments Showing 1-50 of 62 (62 new)
message 1:
by
Megan
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Jul 25, 2012 10:42PM
I was going to write a review of this book but then I read yours and realized you said everything I'd have said.
reply
|
flag
I wish I'd found your review before picking this book up. I couldn't even finish it, and that practically never happens to me. When Tate said "Those security checkpoints can be murder." I hurled my book at the couch and said bad words. I so wanted to enjoy it, but Mira was pretty much fighting me at every turn. Also: bang on about the weird potential incest bit. I kept expecting her to say "And then Shaun rolled over to look into Georgia's eyes, which were so rarely not behind sunglasses..."
Excellent review. I blame the fact that I'm reading the sequel on a masochistic need to find some redeeming qualities in the pain. Plus I have a bad cold and I think the NyQuil is screwing with my judgement. Oh, and the bar on zombie writing quality is so low, I find myself awarding unearned extra credit for the miracle of correct grammar.
Now. Let me get back to my reading. I'm certain there will soon be another riveting account of blood testing, along with fascinating detail about the various kinds of test kits, including the relative costs per unit, accuracy levels and pain potential.
Now. Let me get back to my reading. I'm certain there will soon be another riveting account of blood testing, along with fascinating detail about the various kinds of test kits, including the relative costs per unit, accuracy levels and pain potential.
This has turned into quite the dislike thread. Since I really did not enjoy this one, but I loved Zone One - which is tragic and deep and disturbing where Feed is boring and dumb. Give it a try.
I'm about 250 pages into "Feed" and this review is on point with what I've read so far. I don't understand the inclusion of the possible female candidate who only got as far as she did because of her breast implants. Was she thrown in there so just Georgia could call her a prostitute? Georgia says this earned her the mantle of "bitch" from others. It reminds me of a teenager trying to convince me that they're "edgy".
I liked the book, but think a lot of your points are spot on. The stereotyping especially pissed me off - the only two Christians in the book are traitors, have no genuine personalities, and are hinted at being seen as dumb for their beliefs by the holier-than-thou Georgia. Despite how much I liked this book, the more I think about it, the more I see a lot of juvenile, pissy b.s. that seems like it was written by some closeted, bullied, angry high school student. I just started the second book, and I hope it's more mature than this one.
I really like all the comments, seeing all the 5/4 stars always made me wonder if I was being too picky, but I'm glad I'm not the only one who disliked it!
Jeff; I've found Deadline to be even more frustrating, the plot is better (in my opinion) although the characters are hard work. I hope you get more out of the second book than you did out of this one.
:)
Jeff; I've found Deadline to be even more frustrating, the plot is better (in my opinion) although the characters are hard work. I hope you get more out of the second book than you did out of this one.
:)
Lauren, I'm about halfway through Deadline now, and while I've noticed some things made better in it, there are still a few things that irk me. For instance, one male character keeps mentioning the urge to hit a woman. I'm tempted to throw the book across the room every time I read that crap. I don't know what Mrs. Grant seems to think of the male justification process, but as a male who was born in the God Blessed U.S. South, it's disgusting and makes me hate the character more than relate to him. How does she expect me to bond with a guy who should rightfully get a mudhole stomped in his ass? Ridiculous.
I have a long commute to work so I listen to audiobooks. I find when listening to Feed that I'm NOT really listening to Feed. The zombies don't seem to frighten anyone - they are presented as though they are annoying rodents not terrifying flesh-eating creatures!
I agree with most of the prior comments about some of the absurd elements such as:
1. Zombies are NOT important in this story line and seem like they all could be eliminated easily.
2. Humans going to pricey restaurants and ordering food that should not exist anymore - chicken salad
and a coke- give me a break!!
3. And...blogging! All these years and everyone gets their zombie updates from a blog!!!!! I hope our tech is way more innovative than that so far into the future!!!
4. If you write a zombie story then right it like survivors are terrified. This book reads like a "young adult" story. Very G rated.
5. I miss all the military weapons, military lingo like other good zombie stories! Mira you must read J.L. Bourne's books and Jonathan Maberry. Turn on your tv and watch The Walking Dead and read Robert Kirkman's comics!!!!!!!
Sorry!
C
I agree with most of the prior comments about some of the absurd elements such as:
1. Zombies are NOT important in this story line and seem like they all could be eliminated easily.
2. Humans going to pricey restaurants and ordering food that should not exist anymore - chicken salad
and a coke- give me a break!!
3. And...blogging! All these years and everyone gets their zombie updates from a blog!!!!! I hope our tech is way more innovative than that so far into the future!!!
4. If you write a zombie story then right it like survivors are terrified. This book reads like a "young adult" story. Very G rated.
5. I miss all the military weapons, military lingo like other good zombie stories! Mira you must read J.L. Bourne's books and Jonathan Maberry. Turn on your tv and watch The Walking Dead and read Robert Kirkman's comics!!!!!!!
Sorry!
C
Excellent but depressing review. I'm a quarter of the way through this thing, and you've confirmed my worst fear: it won't get any better. Gah, what a waste of time and money!
I completely disagree with everything you have said. I love this book and think it was brilliant and a different type of zombie book from the traditional market. But everyone is welcome to their own opinions.
the only thing I do not agree with so far is the references to today's culture. where I do think she makes it sound more ancient than it is, I do think people would still remember. we still know pop culture from the 60s, and even before that.
This is pretty much like a subconscious me wrote the exact review I was thinking. I agree totally. (The stupid sunglasses! The repetitive testing! INCEST!) I was actually disappointed when there was no incest, really. These are my thoughts exactly and I'm glad it's not just me!
I've taken a break half way through. For all the reasons you've listed, I don't think I'll be going back. Too many blood tests and too much email checking for a zombie book.
I couldn't agree more with you and your review. That poking zombies with sticks must have sounded like a brilliant idea to share multiple times with the poor reader. Where were the zombies? Why was the protagonist so f....ing mad about every person in the world, except her pocking brother? What good did repeating over and over her eye condition bring to the plot?
Lol yes! Only two things I would add....1) Buffy the Vampire Slayer isn't even current pop culture. My kids don't even know who she is. 2) The only thing that bothered me more than reading this book was reading peoples' reviews of this book who liked it.
Ok I disagree full heartily. You do realize that they uncover a major plot dealing with the Kellis-Amberlee virus right? That's specifically all zombie. Do you prick your finger every day, everywhere? (in order to test for the virus) Is your bedroom sterilized when you leave? Also do you shower with chemicals? Most likely not, plus I feel like to be a zombie book it doesn't have to give you 100% zombie action. How are her characters not real? If you read Georgia has a resivoir condition which means she needs the sunglasses or her eyes will get jacked up. Now the science behind this is that her pupils do not dilate which is something the human eyes does to adjust to light. I feel like her characters were very realistic, they were consistent and they behaved as that particular character would act in that situation.
But it's your opinion so what ever.
But it's your opinion so what ever.
Yes! Finally, someone gets what I mean.
The world could've been interesting (and it was for like, 50 pages) but then it got cliched, uninspired and moved so far away from what it was marketed as.
The world could've been interesting (and it was for like, 50 pages) but then it got cliched, uninspired and moved so far away from what it was marketed as.
I'm half way through and you've verbalised all my thoughts about this book. It's so dull reading about her eye condition and the blood testing over and over.
I find some of your points valid. However, havng checked through the book, Mahir, the British character, uses the the word 'bloody' only once and says 'Bloody Bizarre'. I'm not sure where all these 'bloody hell's are but they're not in the book. It's also made very clear that younger people who grew up within a zombie culture have a general taboo against hugging or personal contact. It is also made clear that most people don't have a clue about why Buffy is called 'Buffy'. However, referencing something from twenty or thirty years ago is not unusual, especially for geeks. I agree with you on the gender stereotyping. It would have been far more interesting had Tate or Ryman (or both) been a woman. ,
Thank you. You have summed up how I’m feeling anmbout this book. I think I don’t need to read 500 more pages of rhisz
I mean you've basically written what I was thinking but I did my own review just to get the annoyance out of my system.
Georgia: "What, you're going to blood test me?"
Security Guard: "Yes please put your hand in the scanner"
Georgia (being sassy): "Huh what again? Why should I?!"
Security Guard: "Yes to stop hundreds of horrible deaths, please put your hand in the scanner"
Georgia (being sassy): "{Eye roll hidden behind cool sunglasses}"
Security Guard: "{Sigh}, just put your hand in the f****** scanner"
Repeat 50 times.
Georgia: "What, you're going to blood test me?"
Security Guard: "Yes please put your hand in the scanner"
Georgia (being sassy): "Huh what again? Why should I?!"
Security Guard: "Yes to stop hundreds of horrible deaths, please put your hand in the scanner"
Georgia (being sassy): "{Eye roll hidden behind cool sunglasses}"
Security Guard: "{Sigh}, just put your hand in the f****** scanner"
Repeat 50 times.
Sandra wrote: "Damn, is it that bad? Thank you for the review, I was thinking on buying it."
88% of people rated it 3 star or higher.
88% of people rated it 3 star or higher.
Jennifer wrote: "88% of people rated it 3 star or higher."
Perhaps there are a lot of bots on here or paid reviews."
Perhaps you're paranoid and self-important in thinking that your opinion is the twue and only one.
Perhaps there are a lot of bots on here or paid reviews."
Perhaps you're paranoid and self-important in thinking that your opinion is the twue and only one.
Charles wrote: "Jennifer wrote: "88% of people rated it 3 star or higher."
Perhaps there are a lot of bots on here or paid reviews."
Perhaps you're paranoid and self-important in thinking that your opinion is th..."
Thanks. I really don’t know what I would have done without that comment. I feel enlightened.
Perhaps there are a lot of bots on here or paid reviews."
Perhaps you're paranoid and self-important in thinking that your opinion is th..."
Thanks. I really don’t know what I would have done without that comment. I feel enlightened.
Thanks. I really don’t know what I would have done without that comment. I feel enlightened.
Oh yeah I get that a lot. Any time. :)
Oh yeah I get that a lot. Any time. :)
Even though I rated this book highly I definitely agree with everything you said!! Sometimes i rate things on the ability to keep my interest and it did make me want to keep reading
I was leaning to not reading this trilogy, but given you slammed Catcher in the Rye, Jane Eyre, Lone Survivor, The Virgin Suicides and American Psycho, I figure perhaps it is a good read.
Michael wrote: "I was leaning to not reading this trilogy, but given you slammed Catcher in the Rye, Jane Eyre, Lone Survivor, The Virgin Suicides and American Psycho, I figure perhaps it is a good read."
It's better than one star. I think I gave it a three? But then literary stuff^ is not really my thing.
It's better than one star. I think I gave it a three? But then literary stuff^ is not really my thing.
Thanks for this honest review. I hate getting baited and tricked by titles and covers. This happened with universal harvester as well.
John wrote: "Thanks for this honest review. I hate getting baited and tricked by titles and covers. This happened with universal harvester as well."
How do you know whether or not he's right if you haven't read the thing? Like it's only honest in terms of his opinion.
How do you know whether or not he's right if you haven't read the thing? Like it's only honest in terms of his opinion.
I completely disagree with what you said about "poking things with a stick" not being funny the first time. Yes it was, even the first couple of times. But then yeah, it did get old. But that first time was gold! LOL
Asexual people exist. Aromantic people exist. People who who find being hugged extremely uncomfortable exist. People with disabilities exist. Just because you aren’t those people doesn’t mean including them in a work of fiction makes the book bad. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that the author should get positive acknowledgment for including broader representation of marginalized groups than one would normally expect to find. I’ve read many Seanan McGuire (Mira Grant) novels, and that is one thing she is consistent about—diverse character representation. If you don’t like the book, I can’t argue with you. But trying to shit all over an author for including character representation you apparently feel shouldn’t be included in fiction, I can definitely argue with you on that point.
Kanisha wrote: "Asexual people exist... the author should get positive acknowledgment for including broader representation of marginalized groups than one would normally expect to find. I’ve read many Seanan McGuire (Mira Grant) novels, and that is one thing she is consistent about—diverse character representation...."
I absolutely agree with you on how well Seanan McGuire includes diversity. However, that doesn't invalidate what this reviewer felt in reference to these characters in this specific book. It was, frankly, weird the way she wrote them and not anywhere near like her usual standards. In my personal opinion. I didn't see this review as trying to vilify any representation, although if you haven't read the book for context, I can see how her wording can be ambiguous. I'm curious if you've read this series? And if so, what did you think about how George and Shawn were written?
I absolutely agree with you on how well Seanan McGuire includes diversity. However, that doesn't invalidate what this reviewer felt in reference to these characters in this specific book. It was, frankly, weird the way she wrote them and not anywhere near like her usual standards. In my personal opinion. I didn't see this review as trying to vilify any representation, although if you haven't read the book for context, I can see how her wording can be ambiguous. I'm curious if you've read this series? And if so, what did you think about how George and Shawn were written?
Agree 100%. I listened to the audiobook, which was a big mistake. The narrator voiced “Buffy” in an irritating manor. I only made it a few hours in and bailed. I felt like I was in a young adult novel discussing things I didn’t care about. I was more interested in zombies.