Rhianna Schoonover's Reviews > The Reapers are the Angels

The Reapers are the Angels by Alden Bell
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3086043
's review

did not like it

Absolutely one of the WORST books I've ever read. The plot is inspired, but its butchered by piss poor authorship & the biggest fuck up of an editor on the planet! It makes the book not even worth the paper that you wipe your butt with!

25 years AFTER the zombies rise we still have electricity, Coke, ice, power enough to run elevators, & plenty of gasoline.Diesel engines still cross the country. The power grids are all still intact, apparently humans don't need to like, SERVICE the machinery of power or anything! Hell, even electronic "tracking devices" still work when applied to cars, as do their receivers! Entire cities stand untouched, minus minor water damage and some lawns gone shaggy, the dead just mill around doing no damage to anything nor did those who died damage anything or even those fleeing the onslaught of the dead. Oh, lets not forget the dust - made up of 90% human skin & very little humans to shed it but there's dust.

Apparently EVERY weather factor on the planet ceases. No hurricanes, Houston is pristine minus some garbage in the gutter (like I said, pristine). No tornadoes, no major damage to roads. A few collapsed overpasses is about all the damage to the US infrastructure in 25 years of the undead & humanity surviving in only small pockets. No floods, the US Gulf coast is near to untouched, if abandoned.

The sun sets in the East! Apparently its an alternate reality in which an editor of a book can't be fucking bothered to actually READ the shit they're putting their name on. Anymore so than the author can be expected to do anything other than talk about lobsterized human-zombie hybrids, made by distilling zombie brain gunk & shooting up, who happen to be inbreed hicks! It seems the most incontrovertible facts of nature - the sun rises in the East & sets in the West, no longer apply!

The rich live in opulent homes & apparently grow their own mustard plants & produce their own mustard, in addition to so many other things from civilization. Let's not miss the booze that's only 6 years old! They must be distilling their own alcohol too!

No one actually SPEAKS in this book. They apparently all use mental speech as there is not ONE DAMN QUOTATION MARK around one single, solitary fucking conversation! A total & complete butchery of the English language. If this is the shit that got published, dear gods I don't want to see the 'manuscript', its probably a bigger steaming pile of shit than this book!

I've read some crappy zombie books. Ones that make me want to rush out & burn every copy on the planet just to save humanity from their crappiness. This one isn't this bad, but if someone else burned it I wouldn't bother putting it out.
54 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Reapers are the Angels.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
May 18, 2011 – Finished Reading
May 19, 2011 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Janene I do think I need to start following your reviews. Haha!! I just finished this book and really having a tough time rating it. You've helped me sort a few things out. :)


Jennifer Wright Thank you, Rhianna. You are dead on (pardon the pun).


message 3: by Lawrence (new)

Lawrence FitzGerald I like an honest review.


message 4: by Mukunthg (new)

Mukunthg right on!:) loved ur review more than the book :)


Ross I'm about halfway through, struggling at every conversation. Who's said what? Are they talking now? So many good reviews that I was thinking that there's something wrong with me...that I just don't get it. It truly is just a waste of time. Horrible book.


Ross I'm about halfway through, struggling at every conversation. Who's said what? Are they talking now? So many good reviews that I was thinking that there's something wrong with me...that I just don't get it. It truly is just a waste of time. Horrible book.


Cheryl Marie I just have to say I hate reviews like this one. I can see it is from years ago, but I never comment on others reviews, but I saw this and I'm just like, "why?" Why attack the author, why attack the editor? Calling them fuck ups, they are obviously out publishing books, successful. Anyhow, all I'm saying is if you hate the book, it's because YOU hate the book. Not because the author did badly, or it's edited poorly. It's because YOU have an issue with it. YOU don't like the wording or whatever the issues are that you couldn't get passed. The author did what they wanted, it's their book. Your dislike of the book is on you and your opinion. I'm not telling you you're wrong, you can dislike, hate, etc anything you want. All I'm saying is instead of being nasty, why not say I didn't like this book, in fact I hated it. I felt it was unbelievable and poorly pieced together. Not the people who created it are fuck ups and don't even pay to wipe your ass with this book. It's honestly just nasty, cruel and unnecessary.


Hades After looking at your profile pic and reading your review, I have one thing to ask you. Do you need a hug?


message 9: by Pouria (new) - added it

Pouria Hahaha, this is my kind of review. Some people write reviews as if they're going to be hired as a writer and their goodreads reviews are what they're going to show their employer as their resume.
I'm still going to read it tho, because I'm mildly interested in it, but thanks for the heads up. :D


back to top