Mary ~Ravager of Tomes~'s Reviews > Water for Elephants
Water for Elephants
by
by
Actual Rating: 1.5 Stars
I went into this book with basically no expectations.
Outside of the preview I saw for the movie starring Robert Pattinson & Reese Witherspoon years ago, I didn't even know what this book was about. Turns out this is a story is set in the 1920's & told from the dual perspectives of Jacob Jankowski when he is 23 & 90 (or maybe 93).
On one hand, the story follows young Jacob right after his parents are both taken from him in a freak car accident. Laden with grief, he abandons his studies & joins the circus. Older Jacob, now bound to the care of a nursing home, reflects on the events of his life & slow dehumanization that occurs after one reaches a certain age.
I have to say, I hardly connected with this book at all. After the initial tragedy of Jacob's parent's deaths, I lost all interest in his life as part of the circus. The story is written well enough, but I didn't find the idea very compelling & I just did not care about his relationships & rivalries with other characters.
You may assume older Jacob's part of the book would be even less interesting by nature, but surprisingly these were the only parts I found myself engaging with. As an old, sarcastic man, Jacob contemplates how the elderly often revert back to the status of young children in the eyes of society. These ideas are simultaneously hilarious & disheartening, and achieved their goal in making me ponder how we treat our elders.
My reading experience with Water for Elephants can only be described as depressing as hell.
There's a lot of unnecessary violence in this story, & some explicit sex scenes that felt entirely pointless. I saw where the author was trying to go, but ultimately the events that take place on both fronts felt contrived.
Sometimes I have moments while reading "Adult" books where I feel as though the author is nervous their book won't be considered "Adult" enough if they don't throw in some blood, gore, & sex. This is the feeling this book gave me. It just wasn't essential to the characterization & it did nothing to salvage my feelings of distaste about the plot in general.
At the end it is revealed that the entirety of young Jacob's experience in the circus takes place in 3.5 months, and I couldn't help but find that laughable. In such a short space of time so much over the top drama takes place without the stabilizing sense of humanity that would've given me a reason to care about this story.
Other than older Jacob's sections, the only other real praise I can muster for this book is the writing. Gruen has a graphic style of writing that really worked for this circus setting.
Otherwise, I don't think this is one I'll be recommending to anyone in the future.
I went into this book with basically no expectations.
Outside of the preview I saw for the movie starring Robert Pattinson & Reese Witherspoon years ago, I didn't even know what this book was about. Turns out this is a story is set in the 1920's & told from the dual perspectives of Jacob Jankowski when he is 23 & 90 (or maybe 93).
On one hand, the story follows young Jacob right after his parents are both taken from him in a freak car accident. Laden with grief, he abandons his studies & joins the circus. Older Jacob, now bound to the care of a nursing home, reflects on the events of his life & slow dehumanization that occurs after one reaches a certain age.
I have to say, I hardly connected with this book at all. After the initial tragedy of Jacob's parent's deaths, I lost all interest in his life as part of the circus. The story is written well enough, but I didn't find the idea very compelling & I just did not care about his relationships & rivalries with other characters.
You may assume older Jacob's part of the book would be even less interesting by nature, but surprisingly these were the only parts I found myself engaging with. As an old, sarcastic man, Jacob contemplates how the elderly often revert back to the status of young children in the eyes of society. These ideas are simultaneously hilarious & disheartening, and achieved their goal in making me ponder how we treat our elders.
My reading experience with Water for Elephants can only be described as depressing as hell.
There's a lot of unnecessary violence in this story, & some explicit sex scenes that felt entirely pointless. I saw where the author was trying to go, but ultimately the events that take place on both fronts felt contrived.
Sometimes I have moments while reading "Adult" books where I feel as though the author is nervous their book won't be considered "Adult" enough if they don't throw in some blood, gore, & sex. This is the feeling this book gave me. It just wasn't essential to the characterization & it did nothing to salvage my feelings of distaste about the plot in general.
At the end it is revealed that the entirety of young Jacob's experience in the circus takes place in 3.5 months, and I couldn't help but find that laughable. In such a short space of time so much over the top drama takes place without the stabilizing sense of humanity that would've given me a reason to care about this story.
Other than older Jacob's sections, the only other real praise I can muster for this book is the writing. Gruen has a graphic style of writing that really worked for this circus setting.
Otherwise, I don't think this is one I'll be recommending to anyone in the future.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Water for Elephants.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
jenn
(new)
Jun 12, 2017 09:57AM
Eeek.
reply
|
flag
Yeah....this is a case of the movie being infinitely better than the book. And that's mostly just because it was pretty!
Lol Rachael that's hilarious!! I have to admit I was slightly interested in still seeing the movie because I do like the actors in it haha
Mary ~Ravager of Tomes~ wrote: "........... YOU PEOPLE AND YOUR WEIRDASS DEAD TREE WHISPERING *screams* lol"
Did you even like the smell of the tree's corpse?
*turns beet red from holding in maniacal laughter*
Did you even like the smell of the tree's corpse?
*turns beet red from holding in maniacal laughter*
-leaves the room-
-cements the door closed behind me-
Goodbye forever just take my friends & the tree corpses make a happy life together without me!!
-cements the door closed behind me-
Goodbye forever just take my friends & the tree corpses make a happy life together without me!!
Did you realize that I, Lord Jennymort, can apperate to where you are my dear?
That and one of these days I shall get you to banter back and forth with me about our collection of tree corpses. One day.
That and one of these days I shall get you to banter back and forth with me about our collection of tree corpses. One day.
If I must end my own life to avoid this conversation then that is a sacrifice I am willing to make. CAN YOU APPARATE INTO THE AFTERLIFE HM????
I could call you with the resurrection stone if I must? Lol
Just this once, I shall stop harassing you about ourcorpse collections.
Just this once, I shall stop harassing you about our
I have to say, I did enjoy the book more than you did. I don't think I want to re-read the book. I was ok with it. To each their own.....
It's so interesting how different people have different experiences with the same book. I thought the parts w/the old man were totally unnecessary and my least favorite part of the story. My favorite part, on the other hand, was Rosie!!
I agree Eve! It could have been the fact that I listened to this in audiobook form but I usually don't let that affect my rating of a book. & I liked Rosie a lot too she was such a sly little elephant haha!
ahh sucks! I had this book on my tbr forever, but now seeing that it has a lot of unnecessary sex and gore I'm not sure I want to read it much anymore.
Iryna definitely some weird unnecessary sex scenes. & I know no one LIKES animal violence but the animal violence here just seemed like it was added for shock not & to make us hate an already hatable character. I wouldn't recommend!
Mary ~Ravager of Tomes~ wrote: "Oh did you like it Megan? :o"
I did like it, but ALSO I read it MANY years ago, like when it came out! I was a kid, LOL - this might be why I was able to relate to the book more.
I did like it, but ALSO I read it MANY years ago, like when it came out! I was a kid, LOL - this might be why I was able to relate to the book more.
That always happens to me. I read a book a while ago, being alright or even good when I first read it, but on second examination, I might change my point of view. Though I remember liking it, some of the plot points I do remember having issues with and I don't intend to read it again.