Eh?Eh!'s Reviews > Married with Zombies

Married with Zombies by Jesse Petersen
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
137273
's review

liked it
bookshelves: goodreaders-made-me, rbrs, babble-added

** spoiler alert ** Rbrs #7/8

This book made me realize I'm not a real horror fan at all, and I would wet myself (w/pee, get your mind out of the gutter and into the sewer) if I ever read or watched a serious horror book or movie instead of the campy and hilarious. Married With Zombies is campy and hilarious, but the first several zombie encounters freaked me out. Note to self, don't read zombie books at night, alone, with only one lamp on.

This was a very fun, light, snarky book. Complaints below shouldn't stop anyone from reading it.

The main characters are a married couple who are on the brink of divorce but a sudden zombie apocalypse brings them together for survival. The story sets up sequels, with non-zombie bad guys still alive to be encountered later, a father who may still be alive, a destination, etc. The writing was aimed directly at my generation, referencing current pop culture that would probably confuse the readers of the near future (my favorite, ...I said with the same reverence I would have used if I saw Joss Whedon or something.). Petty dislike - the author overused the word "whispered." Half the dialogue is "whispered." Try whispering something and hear for yourself how stupid you sound. Besides the dependable "said," I wish she changed it up with "breathed" or "grated" or "howled" or how about nothing and conveying the emotion another way?

These characters survive by drawing upon their knowledge of zombies in movies and books, so I thought about the few zombie movies and books I've seen and read to assess whether I'd survive if the worst happened. What sucks is that they contradict each other, so that tactic probably isn't helpful. But, although the zombies in this particular book are pretty frightening if they were real, they don't make too much sense since a certain behavior would eliminate the likelihood of propagation...comparing the two zombie books I've read, I've made lists of what I remember:

World War Z (WWZ)
- they shamble slowly
- depending on where the infection takes hold in the body, zombification can take hours or days
- they can smell/sense living humans so acting like one doesn't work
- they don't breathe or eat, so they can survive underwater and w/o sustenance
- they will bite/chomp anything, not focused just on braaaaaaains
- they can only be stopped by destroying the zombies' braaaaaaaaains

Married With Zombies (MWZ)
- they can RUN, and retain enough dexterity for doorknobs, and STILL have higher brain function and intelligence intially, and even afterwards they don't just go for the braaaaaains but set up ambushes (like hiding under a desk until a human is within reach, then jumping out)
- they zombify within 15 minutes
- they can be fooled by acting like a zombie
- they breathe (one was described as breathing)
- they hunger for braaaaaains but seem to feast on every body part
- they can only be stopped by destroying the zombies' braaaaaaains

HOW ARE WE EXPECTED TO SURVIVE WHEN OUR SOURCE MATERIALS SAY OPPOSITE THINGS???

The most ridiculous issue is the last couple points - if they eat brains, how do the mangled corpses in MWZ become more zombies when destroying the brain destroys the zombie? Are there that many who pull away and run fast enough to escape zombies that can also run? If they change that fast, how do they spread that fast when they wouldn't be able to hide their state (and bloodiness), and wouldn't be able to operate a vehicle to go any distance? I think WWZ ruined me for any other zombie book, since it thought out the logistics of a zombie apocalypse too well. Also ridiculous, the main characters are crack shots with whatever pistols and rifles they find...wouldn't they need some past shooting experience or practice? So many of their initial reactions to the zombies should've gotten them killed, but they managed to pull through with lucky circumstances each time...pssh.

I'll still read the sequels of this book because it was funny and snide. Logic ruins mindless fun.
21 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Married with Zombies.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 18, 2010 – Shelved
November 2, 2010 – Started Reading
November 4, 2010 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

karen i will review it soon, i promise. i finished it on halloween - spooky!


Eh?Eh! Heh, I think Ceridwen says she's holding onto her review for now, until more people have read it. It's really good, like NSP's review says. You may find that all the pop culture references make the gore palatable.


Eh?Eh! Or, this could be the perfect way to kick that awnwhee. :o)


Eh?Eh! Yeeeaaaahhhhhh...this probably wouldn't be the best book for you to read, not if we're going to get you to watch and quote AoD with us, eventually. There needs to be a slower ramp-up to the blood and guts.


message 5: by Emma (new)

Emma These zombies are clearly not canonical LOL. Or logical.

A comparison of zombie characteristics based on films:
http://sites.dehumanizer.com/zombiety...


Eh?Eh! Emma! That chart is invaluable! We should all study it and be prepared...consensus seems to be:

- zombie bite makes you a zombie
- they act instinctively
- they move slowly
- destroy the braaaaaain


message 7: by Emma (new)

Emma Yes. And likely they smell really, really bad. But that's not on the chart.


Eh?Eh! But would they? Maybe whatever animates them allows decomposition without aroma. That could be why none of the collected lore mentions it.


karen walking dead does


message 10: by Emma (new)

Emma I thought of that, but then I thought, some of them aren't magical, the origin is some freaky virus. So in that case, it seems doubtful.

Of course the whole thing seems doubtful but eh.


Eh?Eh! karen wrote: "walking dead does"

I bet lots of sources mention it, but I'm unwilling to do the necessary work to verify. I'll be one of the first to fall and be stumbling after all y'all's braaaaaains.


Emma wrote: "Of course the whole thing seems doubtful but eh."

And with this attitude, Emma will be stumbling along with me. :o)


message 12: by Emma (new)

Emma LOL. Yes, we can be brain-buddies. Braaaaaaaains.


message 13: by Buck (new)

Buck ...a certain behavior would eliminate the likelihood of propagation...

Let me guess: the zombies spend all their time on a book-themed social-networking site.


Eh?Eh! Buck wrote: "... spend all their time on a book-themed social-networking site."

It seems to work for some.


message 15: by Philip (new)

Philip I for one would go with Max Brooks over Jesse Petersen, as Brooks wrote The Zombie Survival Guide. I think that's the best source material, since it documents the problems with the other source material. (Such as this book...)

This book seems like a good, fun, "campy" read - which it's meant to be. But I wouldn't take fictional zombies seriously.


Incidentally, The Zombie Survival Guide is found in my library's non-fiction section. ...And rightly so.


Eh?Eh! Philip wrote: "Incidentally, The Zombie Survival Guide is found in my library's non-fiction section. ...And rightly so."

Hahaa! That's so cool!


message 17: by Mariel (new)

Mariel I liked this review. Down with logic!


message 18: by Mariel (new)

Mariel The 'fro also likes it.


Eh?Eh! Pitchforks and torches out! Keep the 'fro away from the flames though.


back to top